Orientation — what we draw from. Lineages, ideas, the bee-and-pollen approach to spiritual synthesis.

What we draw from

A modern practice, drawn from many traditions.

Sohamlab is a synthesis. We take inspiration from many living traditions — Buddhist, Christian contemplative, Vedic, Stoic, and Sri Aurobindo's Integral Yoga among them, alongside the practical psychology of attention and the maths of the toroidal field. Other living traditions point at similar moves under different names; our purpose is to draw the practical lessons rather than to debate the vocabularies.

The Aspire / Reject / Surrender frame organises the day. The practices come from wherever they're best.

The horn torus — outer manifold, three operators, glowing seed at the centre

Sources we take inspiration from:

Buddhist mindfulness Christian contemplative Vedic mantra Stoic discipline Sri Aurobindo & others with similar concepts

Many traditions, lightly held

We take inspiration broadly. We don't claim to teach any one tradition; we draw the practical move and let the seeker run it. The product is the synthesis, not allegiance to a lineage.

Aspire / Reject / Surrender — the daily frame

Borrowed from Sri Aurobindo's Integral Yoga because it's the cleanest three-move frame we've found. Other organising patterns exist (Buddhist śīla / samādhi / prajñā; Stoic assent / desire / action). We use what works.

Archetype-first, never tradition-as-truth

When a source names a particular deity (Brahma / Vishnu / Shiva is the example we use), we frame them as one instance of universal Source / Sustain / Sink archetypes. Other traditions have similar concepts under different names. Our purpose is to learn from these patterns, not to argue which one got it right.

Read deeper

Article

The traditions we draw from

Buddhist mindfulness, Christian contemplative silence, Vedic mantra, Stoic discipline, Sri Aurobindo. None of them are the truth. All of them are sources.

buddhist christian vedic stoic aurobindo

Article